Ending Soon! Save 33% on All Access

'Can It Be Copied?' Why Even Celebrity 'Sharks' Care About IP. Intellectual property is something to be protected if you want to attract investment.

By Vic Lin Edited by Dan Bova

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Shark Tank | ABC

I'm not ashamed to admit I like watching Shark Tank . . . a lot. I find it highly entertaining to imagine how I might personally fare as an entrepreneur in The Tank.

Related: 4 Intellectual Property Myths That You Should Avoid

In addition, I bring an extra layer of concern to my viewing because I'm a patent attorney immersed in the area of intellectual property (IP) law. And I can't help but notice how IP plays a part in nearly every investment decision the Sharks make where potential copying is a concern.

While I wouldn't go so far as to say that the show reflects the real world overall, those times that I've seen IP become an issue for the Sharks is certainly not far from reality. Almost without fail, Kevin O'Leary, Mark Cuban, Lori Greiner and the other Sharks delve into the IP issues of the proposals before them whenever they see the potential for copycats.

And in that way, they're just like investors outside The Tank.

Where the risk of copying Is high, the need for IP Is greater.

Indeed, IP was undeniably a critical factor in a deal I recently saw during Season 7 of Shark Tank, where a startup was actually able to get all five sharks to invest. xCraft is a creator of drones that can switch from a traditional hovering mode to a unique high-speed aircraft mode. On the show, inventor JD Claridge showed the company's X PlusOne drone but also another product in development: the PhoneDrone, which turns a smartphone into a drone and is suitable for professional purposes, such as landscaping.

In the end, xCraft not only secured that deal with all five sharks, but ended up with a $6 million valuation, which was more than double the initial $2.5 million valuation with which the company had begun. Fans of the show will recognize that things usually go the other way around, where the sharks attempt to diminish the original valuations entrepreneurs set. So, how did xCraft get all five sharks to invest pursuant to a higher valuation?

Related: Protecting an Idea Is Easy. Selling an Idea Is Hard.

Let me suggest that the following exchange was a pivotal moment: Shark Robert Herjavec asked a couple of key questions that preceded the prediction fellow Shark Daymond John made about a "nasty, nasty shark fight that's about to happen":

Question: "Where's the secret sauce in your company? Tell me what somebody can't knock off." [italics mine]

Answer: "It's really about the IP behind the designs."

The entrepreneurs then explained that their designs were patent-pending and that they envisioned licensing their technology "silly."

The xCraft deal was not unlike the end result of the Windcatcher pitch in Episode 6, where inventor and entrepreneur Ryan Frayne demonstrated a unique valve that allows a user to inflate devices with ease and in a fraction of the time conventional valves require. Again, IP played a major role as Frayne reported that he'd protected his innovation with an issued patent and patents pending.

Of course, where the risk of copying is low, the need for IP Is less: The Sharks have reached deals with companies that don't necessarily have IP or a business model or product that can be easily copied. Rent Like A Champion, which pitched its deal in Episode 6, comes to mind. The business facilitates the rental of homes in small towns that attract big crowds through events such as collegiate football games.

Rent Like A Champion's business model is unlikely to be duplicated because of its intensive and widspread grassroots approach, which sends team members to small towns to educate homeowners in person about using the company's website.

IP Is significant to the ones holding the money.

One pattern I've seen over and over again, meanwhile -- not from Shark Tank, but the real world -- is that entrepreneurs who recognize a potentially high risk for copying tend to have more success raising capital than those who ignore the risk.

That's got to be because those who recognize the risk take steps to protect their innovations. By protecting their IP, they have something to show to the folks writing the checks. So, if you're an entrepreneur developing a product or service that could itself be duplicated you might want to follow their example.

Related: Low-Cost Patent Search Options for Inventors on a Budget

Vic Lin

Patent Attorney & Author of PatentTrademarkBlog.com

Vic Lin is a patent attorney and cofounder of Innovation Capital Law Group, a boutique law firm of startup attorneys. Lin is also the creator of streamliningIP.com, an intellectual property filing site, and PatentTrademarkBlog.com, an IP Q&A knowledge center.

Want to be an Entrepreneur Leadership Network contributor? Apply now to join.

Business News

'Creators Left So Much Money on the Table': Kickstarter's CEO Reveals the Story Behind the Company's Biggest Changes in 15 Years

In an interview with Entrepreneur, Kickstarter CEO Everette Taylor explains the decision-making behind the changes, how he approaches leading Kickstarter, and his advice for future CEOs.

Career

Is Consumer Services a Good Career Path for 2024? Here's the Verdict

Consumer services is a broad field with a variety of benefits and drawbacks. Here's what you should consider before choosing it as a career path.

Business Ideas

87 Service Business Ideas to Start Today

Get started in this growing industry, with options that range from IT consulting to childcare.

Business Models

How to Become an AI-Centric Business (and Why It's Crucial for Long-Term Success)

Learn the essential steps to integrate AI at the core of your operations and stay competitive in an ever-evolving landscape.